Organisational Behaviour of Nestle Company Essay

Organisational Behaviour of Nestle Company - Essay Example The management of day-to-day activities is handled by executive board members. This report aims at giving a detailed analysis and discussion of how the organization is managed and specifically, to how it manages teams and how it makes decisions. This is to evaluate whether the company management practices are in line with management theory as pertains to teamwork and decision making. As such, the report will discuss theory on effective teams and decision making in organizations, examine how the company actually conducts those practices, establish the gap between theory and practice and finally, make recommendations on best practice. I have not worked for the company before but I have researched and obtained enough information to guide the analysis from the company website and other sources such as former employees. BUILDING AND MANAGING EFFECTIVE TEAMS IN THE WORKPLACE EXPECTED Rosenhauer (2005 p. 36) defines a team as â€Å"people who work together in close proximity with each othe r and who interact with other teams in the workplace.† A team is formed to carry out a specific goal. A team can be functional or cross-functional depending on the organization structure and also on the management principles. A functional team comprises of members of same department or who carry out similar functions while cross-functional teams are formed by employees from different functions. Whatever the type of the team, its effectiveness is very crucial in ensuring organizational success. An effective team has various defining characteristics. First, it must have clear purpose or expectations (Heathfield, 2012). While building the team, management should explain to the team what is... This essay aims at giving a detailed analysis and discussion of how the organization is managed and specifically, to how it manages teams and how it makes decisions. This is to evaluate whether the company management practices are in line with management theory as pertains to teamwork and decision making. As such, the essay also aims to discuss theory on effective teams and decision making in organizations, examine how the company actually conducts those practices, establish the gap between theory and practice and finally, make recommendations on best practice. The researcher have not worked for the company before, but he has researched and obtained enough information to guide the analysis from the company website and other sources such as former employees. At Nestle Company, most of the tasks are performed by various departments such as research and development, management, human resources and production. As such, each department works as a team in order to achieve the overall objec tive of the organization. Effective teamwork and sound decision making are key to organization success. Nestle has been successful in various areas but still more needs to be done if it needs to be recognized as a world leader in Nutrition, Health and Wellness and be trusted by all its stakeholders. Nestle has a culture of shared values which guides all its actions but sometimes it may hinder success. Nestle needs to engage employees by involving them in decision making and also train the management on team management and decision making skills.

Criminal Evidence Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Criminal Evidence - Essay Example For physical evidence it can be the weapon used to commit the crime for instance murder weapons if the crime was murder. DNA samples are also another form of physical criminal evidence as well as video footage. Criminal evidence can also be classified into either direct or circumstantial evidence. Direct evidence refers to evidence that is directly linking the defendant to the crime without leaving doubts for instance video footage. On the other hand, circumstantial evidence is evidence that suggests that the defendant committed the crime he or she is being accused of for instance a vehicle fitting description of a witness (Andrews, 1987). Both direct and circumstantial evidence are both acceptable in a criminal case in determining the verdict. None can be said to be more reliable than the other based on the argument that even direct evidence can be made to look like circumstantial evidence (Andrews, 1987). The major difference in the two type of evidence is the motive. While direct evidence is geared towards linking the defendant directly to the crime, circumstantial evidence links him or her indirectly. When a crime is reported, the police rush to the crime scene and secure the place as they look for evidence. They search the whole place and secure the necessary evidence which is then presented at the time of trial. Criminal evidence can also be obtained in court at the time of trial based on the confession made by the witnesses (Andrews, 1987). Moreover, when the defendant remains silent or does not respond to the question they are asked, the silence can be used as evidence to prove that he or she is guilty. For circumstantial evidence in most cases it is obtained in court when the plaintiff proves that the defendant had prior motive of committing the crime. For evidence to be accepted in court, it has to be valid. Evidence that can be rejected in court includes hearsay whereby the evidence is based on what